<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: Accented Characters, Symbols and Special Characters in HTML Documents: Considerations for Search Engine Optimization, Usability and XML Feeds.</title> <atom:link href="http://antezeta.com/news/accented-characters/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://antezeta.com/news/accented-characters</link> <description>Reflections on search engine optimization, web analytics and web marketing</description> <lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 19:31:22 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" /> <item><title>By: Carlo Milani</title><link>http://antezeta.com/news/accented-characters#comment-39302</link> <dc:creator>Carlo Milani</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 14 Dec 2011 09:08:34 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://antezeta.com/news/?p=89#comment-39302</guid> <description>So do you confirm that in the description, keywords and title meta tags &quot;attivit&#224;&quot; will be read and parsed by the bots the same way as &quot;attività&quot;?</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So do you confirm that in the description, keywords and title meta tags &#8220;attivit&agrave;&#8221; will be read and parsed by the bots the same way as &#8220;attività&#8221;?</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Federico Bucchi</title><link>http://antezeta.com/news/accented-characters#comment-33762</link> <dc:creator>Federico Bucchi</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 28 Nov 2011 11:08:08 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://antezeta.com/news/?p=89#comment-33762</guid> <description>What&#039;s the html entity of #?</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What&#8217;s the html entity of #?</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Igor - PortalPress</title><link>http://antezeta.com/news/accented-characters#comment-8719</link> <dc:creator>Igor - PortalPress</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 22 May 2011 09:51:42 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://antezeta.com/news/?p=89#comment-8719</guid> <description>[&quot;data&quot;]=&gt; string(3) &quot;æ»­&quot; [&quot;ord&quot;]=&gt; int(28397) [&quot;xml&quot;]=&gt; string(8) &quot;?&quot;
I&#039;ve developed a translation function which shows any character in any charactersetting. The example above was written in UTF-8, the charactersetting is ISO-8859-1 and the character itself is BIG-5 [Chinese]. I was wondering ìf search-engines could &quot;see&quot; the &#28397; right and I trust you they will.Thanks for your post.Igor - PortalPress</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>["data"]=&gt; string(3) &#8220;æ»­&#8221; ["ord"]=&gt; int(28397) ["xml"]=&gt; string(8) &#8220;?&#8221;<br
/> I&#8217;ve developed a translation function which shows any character in any charactersetting. The example above was written in UTF-8, the charactersetting is ISO-8859-1 and the character itself is BIG-5 [Chinese]. I was wondering ìf search-engines could &#8220;see&#8221; the &#28397; right and I trust you they will.</p><p>Thanks for your post.</p><p>Igor &#8211; PortalPress</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Website localization</title><link>http://antezeta.com/news/accented-characters#comment-5747</link> <dc:creator>Website localization</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 19 Nov 2010 21:30:18 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://antezeta.com/news/?p=89#comment-5747</guid> <description>I know this is an old post, but I agree only to a point. It is true that accented and non-accented characters provide very similar search results, but as I pointed out in one of the posts of my blog (http://www.seo-translator.com/do-search-engines-understand-your-localized-pages-4-%E2%80%93-how-to-ensure-language-recognition/), accented characters are used by some search engines for language recognition (check the use of  language-characteristic words and letters section).the use of special characters can be used to ensure a correct language recognition by the search engine, and there are lots of complaints out there about incorrect language recognition! And what good will it do it if your search results appear in a language that the people searching for a certain keyword do not understand?</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I know this is an old post, but I agree only to a point. It is true that accented and non-accented characters provide very similar search results, but as I pointed out in one of the posts of my blog (<a
href="http://www.seo-translator.com/do-search-engines-understand-your-localized-pages-4-%E2%80%93-how-to-ensure-language-recognition/" rel="nofollow">http://www.seo-translator.com/do-search-engines-understand-your-localized-pages-4-%E2%80%93-how-to-ensure-language-recognition/</a>), accented characters are used by some search engines for language recognition (check the use of  language-characteristic words and letters section).the use of special characters can be used to ensure a correct language recognition by the search engine, and there are lots of complaints out there about incorrect language recognition! And what good will it do it if your search results appear in a language that the people searching for a certain keyword do not understand?</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: sean</title><link>http://antezeta.com/news/accented-characters#comment-2166</link> <dc:creator>sean</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 02 Mar 2009 13:23:21 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://antezeta.com/news/?p=89#comment-2166</guid> <description>Andrea, you raise an interesting point.In principle, you&#039;re right, accented characters should be used instead of placing an apostrophe after the letter in question. Yet search engines must deal with what they find in the real world, especially when a particular usage is fairly common.As you will surely know, Italians often use an apostrophe instead of typographically correct accented character.  This is especially so with E&#039; instead of È.... so, linguistically, right or wrong, the search engines cannot and don&#039;t generally ignore what is going on in the wild.In the end, the point of this article was to get people to use numeric html entities as the preferred approach; perhaps I could have been clearer on this point.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Andrea, you raise an interesting point.</p><p>In principle, you&#8217;re right, accented characters should be used instead of placing an apostrophe after the letter in question. Yet search engines must deal with what they find in the real world, especially when a particular usage is fairly common.</p><p>As you will surely know, Italians often use an apostrophe instead of typographically correct accented character.  This is especially so with E&#8217; instead of È&#8230;. so, linguistically, right or wrong, the search engines cannot and don&#8217;t generally ignore what is going on in the wild.</p><p>In the end, the point of this article was to get people to use numeric html entities as the preferred approach; perhaps I could have been clearer on this point.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Andrea</title><link>http://antezeta.com/news/accented-characters#comment-2164</link> <dc:creator>Andrea</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 02 Mar 2009 07:43:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://antezeta.com/news/?p=89#comment-2164</guid> <description>I know that this is an old post, but I&#039;ve ran into it just now and I&#039;ve found this extremely wrong sentence &quot;Instead of using an accented character, the accent is placed after the character, i.e. sara’ or sara` instead of sarà. This approach is often seen in Italy. While this approach is fine, use of accented characters can give a document a more professional look.&quot;.I&#039;m Italian and I can assure you that is the use of &quot;apostrophes&quot; as a replacement of accents is wrong!. This is just a typical behavior of lazy people.Also consider that not all accents are at the end of the word and that there is a difference between accent acute and accent grave, that you can&#039;t simplify with a mere apostrophe.For instance, how would you write &quot;Vìola&quot;? &quot;Vi`ola&quot;?So, next time, before writing wrong information, make some serious investigation.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I know that this is an old post, but I&#8217;ve ran into it just now and I&#8217;ve found this extremely wrong sentence &#8220;Instead of using an accented character, the accent is placed after the character, i.e. sara’ or sara` instead of sarà. This approach is often seen in Italy. While this approach is fine, use of accented characters can give a document a more professional look.&#8221;.</p><p>I&#8217;m Italian and I can assure you that is the use of &#8220;apostrophes&#8221; as a replacement of accents is wrong!. This is just a typical behavior of lazy people.</p><p>Also consider that not all accents are at the end of the word and that there is a difference between accent acute and accent grave, that you can&#8217;t simplify with a mere apostrophe.</p><p>For instance, how would you write &#8220;Vìola&#8221;? &#8220;Vi`ola&#8221;?</p><p>So, next time, before writing wrong information, make some serious investigation.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: basic
Database Caching 1/4 queries in 0.116 seconds using disk: basic
Object Caching 447/450 objects using disk: basic

Served from: antezeta.com @ 2012-02-08 12:21:50 -->
